Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research

Excerpts

Of 49 highly cited original clinical research studies, 45 claimed that the intervention was effective. Of these, 7 (16%) were contradicted by subsequent studies, 7 others (16%) had found effects that were stronger than those of subsequent studies, 20 (44%) were replicated, and 11 (24%) remained largely unchallenged. Five of 6 highlycited nonrandomized studies had been contradicted or had found stronger effects vs 9 of 39 randomized controlled trials (P=.008). Among randomized trials, studies with contradicted or stronger effects were smaller (P=.009) than replicated or unchallenged studies although there was no statistically significant difference in their early or overall citation impact. Matched control studies did not have a significantly different share of refuted results than highly cited studies, but they included more studies with “negative” results.

Reference

John PA Ioannidis “Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research” (2005) DOI: 10.1001/jama.294.2.218

@Article{ioannidis2005a,
  title = {Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research},
  volume = {294},
  issn = {0098-7484},
  url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.294.2.218},
  doi = {10.1001/jama.294.2.218},
  number = {2},
  journal = {JAMA},
  publisher = {American Medical Association (AMA)},
  author = {Ioannidis, John PA},
  year = {2005},
  month = {jul},
  pages = {218}
}