The earth is flat (p>0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research
Abstract
The widespread use of ‘statistical significance’ as a license for making a claim of a scientific finding leads to considerable distortion of the scientific process (according to the American Statistical Association). We review why degrading
Reference
Valentin Amrhein, Fränzi Korner-Nievergelt, Tobias Roth “The earth is flat (p\textgreater0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research” (2017) DOI: 10.7717/peerj.3544
@Article{amrhein2017,
title = {The earth is flat (p\textgreater0.05): significance thresholds and the crisis of unreplicable research},
volume = {5},
issn = {2167-8359},
shorttitle = {The earth is flat (p\textgreater0.05)},
url = {https://peerj.com/articles/3544},
doi = {10.7717/peerj.3544},
abstract = {The widespread use of ‘statistical significance’ as a license for making a claim of a scientific finding leads to considerable distortion of the scientific process (according to the American Statistical Association). We review why degrading},
language = {en},
urldate = {2020-01-07},
journal = {PeerJ},
author = {Amrhein, Valentin and Korner-Nievergelt, Fränzi and Roth, Tobias},
month = {jul},
year = {2017},
note = {ZSCC: 0000098},
pages = {e3544}
}