Reference
Britta L Anderson, Sterling Williams, Jay Schulkin “Statistical literacy of obstetrics-gynecology residents” (2013) // Journal of graduate medical education. Publisher: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Suite 2000, 515~…. Vol. 5. No 2. Pp. 272–275. DOI: 10.4300/jgme-d-12-00161.1
Bib
@Article{anderson2013,
title = {Statistical literacy of obstetrics-gynecology residents},
author = {Anderson, Britta L and Williams, Sterling and Schulkin, Jay},
journal = {Journal of graduate medical education},
volume = {5},
number = {2},
pages = {272--275},
year = {2013},
publisher = {The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Suite 2000, 515~…},
doi = {10.4300/jgme-d-12-00161.1}
}
Quotes (1)
Statistical Literacy Training for obstetrics-gynecology Residents
Methods In 2011 we surveyed US obstetrics-gynecology residents participating in the Council for Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology In-Training Examination about their statistical literacy and statistical literacy training.
Results Our response rate was 95% (4713 of 4961). About two-thirds (2980 of 4713) of the residents rated their statistical literacy training as adequate. Female respondents were more likely to rate their statistical literacy training poorly, with 25% (897 of 3575) indicating inadequate literacy compared with 17% (141 of 806) of the male respondents (P < .001). Respondents performed poorly on 2 statistical literacy questions, with only 26% (1222 of 4713) correctly answering a positive predictive value question and 42% (1989 of 4173) correctly defining a P value. A total of 51% (2391 of 4713) of respondents reported receiving statistical literacy training through a journal club, 29% (1359 of 4713) said they had informal training, 15% (711 of 4713) said that they had statistical literacy training as part of a course, and 11% (527 of 4713) said that they had no training.